Archive for the ‘Media’ Category

Tidbits

Saturday, March 6th, 2010

This and that:

Ethics Panel, Connecticut Edition

Thursday, July 16th, 2009

A good catch from the Laurel:

Lost amidst the juicier stuff is a point raised three times in Shelly Sindland’s complaint against her employer, Fox61; her concern that “the respondent was committing ethical violations related to receiving payment for news stories.”

One of the interesting things in this kind of public fight is that there’s the nominal reason for the lawsuit (the discrimination case), and the reason that the company is going to settle without making a fuss.

From the complaint (provided by the CT Employment Law Blog here):

29. In approximately September 2008, I approached Rockstroh about my concerns that the respondent was committing ethical violations related to receiving payment for news stories. I was told by Rockstroh that “you are not going to win this one.”

37. In approximately February 2009,1 again approached Rockstroh regarding my concerns that the respondent was committing ethical violations related to receiving payment for news stories.

41. On or about April 13, 2009, I once again approached Rockstroh regarding my concerns that the respondent was committing ethical violations related to receiving payment for news stories.

52. In approximately mid-May 2009, I approached Patz regarding my concerns that the respondent was committing ethical violations related to receiving payment for news stories. Patz stated to me that if she looked into the allegations, it would “only make matters worse for [me]” and that she was “worried about my daughter and [me] and that [I] needed my job.”

With all due respect to the Laurel, this is the juicier stuff. “The respondent” is not one of these goofball editors that was giving her a hard time, but rather, “the Tribune Company (hereinafter “Tribune”) d/b/a Fox 61 News.” And, in the middle of the complaint, these points appear way out of context.

Sindland is, of course, the station’s political reporter. I don’t know what story could have been both of such interest that she might have picked a fight with management (which she was “not going to win”) over it, and was continuing from September 2008 to May 2009.

On a totally unrelated note, the only discriminatory action directly related to news coverage mentioned in the complaint?

54. On or about May 23, 2009, I was the only local Connecticut reporter invited to the White House Rose Garden to report on a bill signing regarding credit card reform act legislation sponsored by Senator Christopher Dodd. That reporting was never used in any type of promotional materials. I was never commended on or acknowledged in any way for this invitation or my coverage of the event.

Noted for the Record: Traffic Cameras

Friday, June 26th, 2009

Meanwhile, we have turned into a public-relations society. Much of the news Americans get each day was created to serve just that purpose—to be the news of the day. Many of our headlines come from events created by public relations—press conferences, speeches, press releases, canned reports, and, worst of all, snappy comments by “spokesmen” or “experts.” To serve as a counterpoint, we need reporters with expertise.

— Walter Pincus, Newspaper Narcissism

Three cheers again for the Fairfield County Weekly, which has had a recent trend toward publishing political stories that are interesting but which I had no idea I was interested in before they published the piece. We all know from political friends in the state and long-running discussions on different policy issues which bills to follow in the legislature, which ambitious politicos are looking to move up, which perennial subjects will produce some news and some competing press releases, and so on.

In any case, check out this article about the introduction of roving traffic cameras — the way that they’re changing law enforcement practices, and the new privacy concerns that they’re raising. It involves genuine reporting from sources in no fewer than five different cities, and sets the table for a debate that very few people are interested in having just yet. News of the day week that’s not designed to be the news of the day.

Ned vs. Fox News on the Stimulus

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

Lamont debates conservative Catholic priest Father John Morris on the stimulus package:

“But Father, I can’t judge the Catholic church by what some individual priests do. I don’t judge this bill by what some individual items are.”

Ned’s getting a little bit of street brawling on there.

Squint Real Hard

Friday, February 6th, 2009

Rick Green hears something different in Rell’s budget speech:

Republican Chair Chris Healy was ecstatic and Democratic mayors were wary, but if you closed your eyes and cut out the red-meat-for-right-wingers portions of her talk, Rell didn’t sound so GOP to me[.]

Well, sure, if you ignore those portions of the talk.

“If you closed your eyes.” Just… wow.

Political Journalism Watch

Friday, February 6th, 2009

There’s a lot to criticize in Connecticut’s political media, but when something is worthy of praise…

This week’s Fairfield County Weekly seems to have stepped up the pace on the political reporting front, with a handful of stories that are refreshingly informative and detailed.

First, Cut and Run by Andy Bromage:

Like most Gulf War vets, the federal Veterans Administration refuses to test Sterry for exposure to depleted uranium or other chemical toxins she was exposed to in the Middle East.

So Sterry turned to the state government, and in 2005 helped Connecticut become the first state in the nation to craft a law to test returning combat troops for exposure to battlefield health hazards, including depleted uranium. The law would also establish a veterans health registry to catalog mysterious symptoms crippling war vets, similar to the Connecticut Tumor Registry, which tracks cancer patterns in the state. The data could be used as leverage to pressure the federal government to accept disabilities as service-related, and therefore treat them.

But the state has turned its back on Sterry and the more than 30,000 Connecticut troops who have deployed to combat zones in the Middle East and the Balkans since 1990. The Weekly has learned that Gov. Jodi Rell, through her budget office, quietly killed funding for the veterans health registry without telling the lawmakers who sponsored the program, nor the veterans whom it would serve. [...]

Linda Schwartz, commissioner of Veterans Affairs for the state, broke the news last week to the legislature’s Select Committee on Veterans Affairs during a special meeting at the Connecticut veterans’ home in Rocky Hill. Her budget was being cut, she said, and $165,000 of it would come from the sick-soldiers registry.

What she didn’t mention, and what some lawmakers were not aware of until very recently, was that the funding was eliminated last June during Gov. Rell’s first round of state budget cuts.

In fact, after four years of hearings, debates and lobbying, the program was just days away from receiving the money it needed to hire staff and begin testing. Funding was set for release on July 1, 2008. The governor’s office announced the cut on June 24.

Decoding Rob Simmons by Andy Bromage:

“In reading through the recent speech given to the new legislature, did you see any specific recommendations for dealing with this problem?” Simmons asks me in a recent interview. “Since then, have you heard any specific recommendations for dealing with this problem, other than taking a free day?”

Well, there was the governor’s cost-cutting plan recently approved by the legislature, I say.

“In this environment — in an environment of permanent fiscal crisis — these ideas have to be out there,” Simmons says. “It’s not good enough to surprise everybody in February.”[...]

It’s rare to hear Democrats go after Rell these days for fear of retaliation, let alone a Republican. Let alone a Republican who worked for Rell just a few weeks ago.

Simmons left that job early last month after Rell and the legislature essentially dissolved the Office of the Business Advocate as a cost-saving measure.

Now Simmons is in the market again but he wouldn’t tell me whether he’s interested in running for governor in 2010, or for Chris Dodd’s U.S. Senate seat, as has also been rumored.

Fact and Factions by Nick Keppler, an article about Bridgeport NAACP President (and former Shays GOTV worker) Craig Kelly:

One dispute has been about money. A letter from Dorothy Smith — to Kelly, the Executive Committee and state and national NAACP officials, dated Nov. 10, 2007 — complains that, unbeknownst to her, Kelly arranged to have money raised at the 2007 Freedom Fund Banquet, the branch’s largest yearly fund-raiser, deposited in a new account to which she did not have access. National officials told Kelly to close the account and put its funds in the general account. (Kelly confirms this series of events.)

[...]

Last November, Kelly was challenged for the presidency by Wayne Winston. It was not pretty.

On Nov. 13, 114 people who claimed to be members of the Greater Bridgeport NAACP voted at Messiah Baptist Church. Only 82 of the ballots were counted, and Kelly won 42-40.

Among the 32 people whose membership was challenged were such Bridgeport politicos as City Councilman Andre Baker, State Rep. Don Clemons and State Sen. Ed Gomes. Wayne Winston’s standing as a member was also challenged. All of them were denied by then-Secretary Carolyn Vermont, who was voted first vice president that evening under the slate headed by Kelly. She says those voters simply didn’t have their membership in order.[...]

Spearheaded by Winston and Cash — who lost the presidency and first vice presidency to Kelly and Vermont, respectively — 25 people signed a complaint to the national and state NAACP. Scot X. Esdaile, president of the Connecticut State Conference, and Rev. Gill Ford, regional director of the national NAACP, told the Connecticut Post the matter is resolved and Kelly is the victor. When the Weekly attempted to contact state and national officials about the issue, we were referred back to the Greater Bridgeport office.

Fabrizi Unleashed by Rob Sullivan:

Fabrizi also takes exception to Finch’s contention that one of the main reasons for the current budget mess is the former mayor’s excessive reliability on one-time revenue streams to balance the budget.

“When he came into office, there were two outstanding projects for which we were relying on revenue,” he says. “One was the $4.5 million payment from the Steel Point Developers and the other was $3 million from American Fabrics on Connecticut Avenue. Now, his administration wound up receiving $2 million for the American Fabrics location, which I never would have done. And for all his pointing and wagging his finger, he turned around and put the expected $4.5 million right back in the budget.”

That $4.5 million expected payment was included in the city’s budget, which was passed May 13. That payment was lost when Bridgeport and then–lead developer Midtown Properties of Manhattan missed a deadline for a land disposition agreement in late August. RCI Marine of Miami has since become the Steel Point project’s lead developer, and plans are underway for a smaller-scale version of the massive lead development project planned for the city’s East End.

In talking about Steel Point and other stalled development projects in the Park City, Fabrizi observes, “You have to be in constant contact with these developers. Obviously, that didn’t happen.”

I don’t know what led the Weekly to eat their Wheaties for this week’s edition, but these stories are a couple cuts above what we normally see on newsprint in the state. They get facts that can’t be found in any press releases, ask (and follow up on) detailed questions to people who are in a position to know the uncomfortable history of a situation, report on who wouldn’t answer which questions, and importantly, lay out compelling facts for people who are generally informed, and offer context for people who aren’t.

None of that should be remarkable, but all of it is. Let’s hope they keep it up.

“Or Does He”

Friday, February 6th, 2009

Shelly Sindland, describing why she wasn’t able to accept Dodd’s invitation to examine his mortgage documents, in a post titled Dodd Comes Clean – or Does He?

My daughter starts projectile vomiting. I am covered in toddler barf and instead of calling back Senator Dodd’s office, I call Sadie’s Doctor.

After hounding him since June, Today is the day Senator Dodd decides to release his controversial, country-wide mortgage documents. He says he will re-finance his loans just to play it safe.

You might want to say that Sadie has a “sick” sense about these things. I can’t help but wonder if there is any symbolism here? Either way, this story will have to wait.

Fearless journalism is the cornerstone of our democracy. Obviously, we have nothing to worry about.

State of the Union

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

In graphs:

Via Ezra Klein.

News on the News

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

While I’m setting up the scaffolding here, not every addition to the blogroll is going to get its own post, but one came across the wire today that I think merits special attention: via Lennie at OIB, check out The Laurel, a blog by reporter-turned-consultant Duby McDowell and lobbyist Kevin Hill on the Connecticut news media.

One of the biggest challenges in observing and discussing the media is that, while these outlets put out a daily product, their inner workings are obscure. And most newsrooms are reluctant to treat details of their own staff changes or internal reorganizations as newsworthy – even less so with the shrinking number of owners, as publishers try not to embarrass themselves by announcing weaker coverage in advance.

How much “dishing” there will be remains to be seen – as a consultant, McDowell still needs people to take her calls – but it’s promising to see a blog from someone experienced in the business reporting on the business. I’ll certainly be watching the site.